PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and HULC.TO (Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XUU.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while HULC.TO tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUU.TO returned 15.81%/yr vs 34.17%/yr for HULC.TO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUU.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HULC.TO.

Performance

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUU.TO having a 12.48% return and HULC.TO slightly higher at 12.50%.

XUU.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.40%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.56%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
15.46%

HULC.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
7.49%
YTD
12.50%
6M
10.64%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
24.34%
5Y*
34.17%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		12.48%11.25%34.07%23.11%-13.53%25.93%22.92%
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF		12.50%12.69%35.93%24.43%-14.75%153.78%26.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XUU.TO and HULC.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.76

The correlation between XUU.TO and HULC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUU.TO
HULC.TO

Technology

37.3%
35.3%

Financial Services

11.2%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.0%

Communication Services

9.8%
11.6%

Industrials

8.8%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.8%

Energy

3.4%
3.6%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

XUU.TO
37.3%
HULC.TO
35.3%

Financial Services

XUU.TO
11.2%
HULC.TO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XUU.TO
9.8%
HULC.TO
10.0%

Communication Services

XUU.TO
9.8%
HULC.TO
11.6%

Industrials

XUU.TO
8.8%
HULC.TO
8.5%

Healthcare

XUU.TO
8.4%
HULC.TO
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

XUU.TO
4.4%
HULC.TO
4.8%

Energy

XUU.TO
3.4%
HULC.TO
3.6%

Utilities

XUU.TO
2.5%
HULC.TO
2.3%

Real Estate

XUU.TO
2.2%
HULC.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

XUU.TO
1.9%
HULC.TO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF

Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with XUU.TO:
XUU.TO vs. XUS.TOXUU.TO vs. VUN.TOXUU.TO vs. XAW.TOXUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUU.TO vs. XIC.TOXUU.TO vs. VTIXUU.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with HULC.TO:
HULC.TO vs. HXS.TOHULC.TO vs. FCUQ.TOHULC.TO vs. SMVP.TOHULC.TO vs. XHU.TOHULC.TO vs. XMTM.TOHULC.TO vs. TULV.TOHULC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Return for Risk

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUU.TO
XUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
HULC.TO
HULC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) and Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUU.TOHULC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
2.38

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.32
3.26

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.41

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

12.23

+0.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUU.TO and HULC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUU.TOHULC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.73

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.75

+0.11

Drawdowns

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, which is greater than HULC.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU.TO and HULC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUU.TOHULC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-23.94%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-8.73%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-19.46%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-23.94%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.22%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.15%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-4.68%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.43%

-0.13%

Volatility

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) at 3.01%. This indicates that XUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HULC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUU.TOHULC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.01%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.25%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

12.53%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

46.99%

-31.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

43.82%

-27.23%

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HULC.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUU.TO vs. HULC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		1.01%1.16%1.02%1.22%1.38%1.01%1.33%1.68%1.73%1.49%1.65%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.94, XUU.TO and HULC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HULC.TO.

XUU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XUU.TO and 0.08% for HULC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUU.TO and HULC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer