PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUU-U.TO is traded in USD, while HULC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HULC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with XUU-U.TO at 11.58% and HULC.TO at 11.58%.


XUU-U.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
4.96%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.20%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*

HULC.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
30.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
11.58%16.34%22.50%26.52%-20.40%28.14%21.36%
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF
11.58%18.09%25.19%27.26%-20.45%155.66%32.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.51

Over the past year, XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HULC.TO
HULC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUU-U.TOHULC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.41

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.23

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.43

14.52

+0.91

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the HULC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUU-U.TOHULC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.23

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.66

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.73

+0.16

Drawdowns

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.73%, which is greater than HULC.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUU-U.TOHULC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.73%

-26.59%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-8.85%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-19.07%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-25.90%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-5.58%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.97%

-0.11%

Volatility

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) is 2.87%, while Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC.TO) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that XUU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HULC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUU-U.TOHULC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.15%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

9.62%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

12.83%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

46.88%

-30.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

44.07%

-26.42%

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUU-U.TO vs. HULC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while HULC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HULC.TO
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.83%0.76%0.85%1.01%0.77%0.90%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index, while HULC.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUU-U.TO and HULC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer