PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUTC.DE having a 24.28% return and AYEW.DE slightly higher at 24.61%.


XUTC.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
14.39%
YTD
24.28%
6M
23.11%
1Y
49.23%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
24.06%
10Y*

AYEW.DE

1D
-1.67%
1M
15.12%
YTD
24.61%
6M
23.38%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
21.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUTC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
24.28%9.83%44.60%52.37%-27.42%44.01%32.64%12.75%
AYEW.DE
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
24.61%9.65%33.73%55.77%-29.69%41.89%30.99%12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.98

The correlation between XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTC.DE
XUTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

AYEW.DE
AYEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AYEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTC.DEAYEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.01

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

8.00

-0.16

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the AYEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTC.DEAYEW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.26

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.93

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.02

+0.09

Drawdowns

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, roughly equal to the maximum AYEW.DE drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTC.DEAYEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-31.36%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-14.98%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-29.01%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-30.10%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.13%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-7.74%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

5.64%

+0.62%

Volatility

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) at 6.77%. This indicates that XUTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTC.DEAYEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

6.77%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

14.89%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

19.98%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

22.77%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

23.48%

-0.51%

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AYEW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTC.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUTC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than AYEW.DE's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AYEW.DE
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.46%0.82%0.40%0.65%0.12%0.00%
XUTC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.34%0.36%0.53%1.14%0.51%0.64%0.59%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUTC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AYEW.DE.

XUTC.DE tracks MSCI USA Information Technology 20/35 Custom, while AYEW.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUTC.DE and 0.18% for AYEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTC.DE and AYEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer