XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO
XUT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF) and VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUT.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index, while VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XUT.TO returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.00%/yr for VEE.TO. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XUT.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VEE.TO.
Performance
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUT.TO achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than VEE.TO's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XUT.TO has outperformed VEE.TO with an annualized return of 8.49%, while VEE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.
XUT.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.97%
VEE.TO
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 26.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$2.11M | CA$2.98M | CA$3.67M | |
| CA$10.74M | CA$10.10M | CA$10.64M |
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 17.46% | 14.74% | 13.09% | -0.45% | -11.02% | 8.92% | 14.74% | 36.63% | -8.30% | 10.16% |
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 14.60% | 19.32% | 19.06% | 6.24% | -12.79% | 0.06% | 12.32% | 14.32% | -7.93% | 22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUT.TO and VEE.TO is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2011 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XUT.TO and VEE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUT.TO
VEE.TO
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XUT.TO
VEE.TO
Energy
XUT.TO
VEE.TO
Basic Materials
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Communication Services
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Consumer Defensive
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Financial Services
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Healthcare
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Industrials
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Real Estate
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Technology
XUT.TO
-
VEE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUT.TO
VEE.TO
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUT.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.46 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 7.88 | -0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, which is greater than VEE.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT.TO and VEE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUT.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.65% | -29.84% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -10.74% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.47% | -14.97% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -25.82% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | -29.84% | -7.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -2.44% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -8.67% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.35% | -0.63% |
Volatility
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) is 3.01%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that XUT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUT.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 6.23% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 15.26% | -8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 17.50% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 15.65% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 17.06% | -0.89% |
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUT.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VEE.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUT.TO vs. VEE.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than VEE.TO's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 1.81% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.83% | 3.35% | 2.18% | 1.62% | 2.71% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.01% | 2.53% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 3.13% | 3.91% | 4.00% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.04% | 4.51% | 3.57% | 4.52% | 3.57% | 3.74% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUT.TO and VEE.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XUT.TO.
XUT.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VEE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. XUT.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index, while VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XUT.TO and 0.25% for VEE.TO.
Find the right allocation for XUT.TO and VEE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer