XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO).
XUSF.TO and CIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUSF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2023. CIC.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Aug 18, 2010.
Performance
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSF.TO iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF | -8.65% | 9.67% | 39.77% | 8.23% |
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 1.51% | 36.24% | 21.30% | 8.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUSF.TO achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly lower than CIC.TO's 1.51% return.
XUSF.TO
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- -1.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIC.TO
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 42.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUSF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIC.TO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUSF.TO
CIC.TO
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUSF.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | 3.45 | -3.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 4.45 | -4.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.71 | -0.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 5.28 | -5.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 22.30 | -22.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUSF.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 3.45 | -3.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.64 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between XUSF.TO and CIC.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CIC.TO's 5.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSF.TO iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF | 0.93% | 0.75% | 0.81% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 5.85% | 5.72% | 6.71% | 7.37% | 7.64% | 5.48% | 9.56% | 6.16% | 6.61% | 5.68% | 6.72% | 7.31% |
Drawdowns
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum CIC.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSF.TO and CIC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUSF.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.88% | -38.55% | +21.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -8.23% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.42% | -5.35% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -5.54% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 1.95% | +3.63% |
Volatility
XUSF.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) at 5.39%. This indicates that XUSF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XUSF.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 5.39% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 9.06% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 12.48% | +9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 12.56% | +5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 16.26% | +2.08% |