PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XUSE.AS
iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF
2.29%25.69%
R1GR.AS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF
-9.53%17.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSE.AS achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's -9.53% return.


XUSE.AS

1D
3.69%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
2.29%
6M
7.60%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

R1GR.AS

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-9.53%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
19.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSE.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSE.AS
XUSE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XUSE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

R1GR.AS
R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSE.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

0.96

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.48

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.92

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.52

6.72

+6.80

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSE.AS and R1GR.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSE.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.96

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.99

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between XUSE.AS and R1GR.AS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUSE.AS nor R1GR.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSE.AS drawdown since its inception was -12.97%, smaller than the maximum R1GR.AS drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSE.AS and R1GR.AS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSE.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-23.09%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-15.71%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-12.16%

+5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-3.37%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

4.49%

-1.87%

Volatility

XUSE.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) at 5.74%. This indicates that XUSE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUSE.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

5.74%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

11.64%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

19.65%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

19.03%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

19.03%

-2.97%