PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUSC.TO is traded in CAD, while ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZSP-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSC.TO achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP-U.TO's 11.99% return.


XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
7.23%
YTD
11.99%
6M
9.98%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
12.69%11.40%11.76%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
11.99%11.48%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.90

The correlation between XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSC.TOZSP-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.24

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

12.46

+0.95

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSC.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.46

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Drawdowns

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSC.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-27.34%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-8.83%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-3.51%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.29%

-0.22%

Volatility

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) is 2.61%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that XUSC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSC.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.96%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

8.99%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.64%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.95%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.04%

-0.32%

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSC.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUSC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while ZSP-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.84%0.94%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.00%0.14%0.71%0.98%1.13%0.91%1.02%1.07%1.26%1.22%1.43%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

XUSC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZSP-U.TO is S&P 500. XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUSC.TO and 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSC.TO and ZSP-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer