XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO
XUS-U.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) and ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from iShares and BMO respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUS-U.TO returned 13.33%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for ZSP.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XUS-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZSP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZSP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUS-U.TO having a 10.51% return and ZSP.TO slightly higher at 10.76%.
XUS-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 27.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.51% | 17.66% | 24.36% | 26.17% | -19.01% | 27.74% | 18.01% | 8.12% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.76% | 17.39% | 24.40% | 26.11% | -18.52% | 28.48% | 17.92% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XUS-U.TO
ZSP.TO
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUS-U.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.10 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 14.16 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUS-U.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.31 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, roughly equal to the maximum ZSP.TO drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUS-U.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.55% | -33.49% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -8.86% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.65% | -18.69% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -24.63% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.69% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.74% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.93% | +0.02% |
Volatility
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) is 2.85%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that XUS-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUS-U.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 3.35% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 8.99% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 11.88% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 16.94% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 18.12% | +1.07% |
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUS-U.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than ZSP.TO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 0.71% | 0.91% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.44% | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.
Find the right allocation for XUS-U.TO and ZSP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer