PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUS-U.TO is traded in USD, while XBAL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XBAL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUS-U.TO achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than XBAL.TO's 4.34% return.


XUS-U.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
7.31%
6M
6.55%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*

XBAL.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
4.34%
6M
2.41%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
6.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
7.31%18.07%24.74%26.55%-18.73%27.72%18.39%8.13%
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
4.34%17.26%6.76%15.80%-16.45%10.21%13.42%5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2019

0.62

The correlation between XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUS-U.TO
XUS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAL.TO
XBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUS-U.TOXBAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.82

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

7.42

+3.37

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, smaller than the maximum XBAL.TO drawdown of -47.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUS-U.TOXBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-47.75%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-6.98%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-9.87%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.96%

-24.50%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-3.07%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-7.45%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.71%

+0.32%

Volatility

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) at 3.92%. This indicates that XUS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUS-U.TOXBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.92%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

8.55%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

10.23%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

10.92%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

11.83%

+7.34%

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUS-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUS-U.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than XBAL.TO's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.10%2.27%2.72%2.43%2.12%1.78%2.04%2.31%3.47%3.00%3.72%3.38%
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
1.16%1.25%1.04%1.19%1.38%0.89%1.20%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBAL.TO.

XUS-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XBAL.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUS-U.TO and 0.20% for XBAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUS-U.TO and XBAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer