PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUS-U.TO is traded in USD, while HXS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HXS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUS-U.TO having a 10.51% return and HXS.TO slightly higher at 10.61%.


XUS-U.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.35%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.77%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

HXS.TO

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.07%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
10.51%17.66%24.36%26.17%-19.01%27.74%18.01%8.12%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
10.61%17.30%24.32%26.03%-18.56%28.24%18.10%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2019

0.84

The correlation between XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUS-U.TO
XUS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUS-U.TOHXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.07

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

14.10

+0.23

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUS-U.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.26

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.77

+0.07

Drawdowns

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, roughly equal to the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -33.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUS-U.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-33.93%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.96%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-18.71%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-24.84%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.67%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-4.23%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.94%

+0.01%

Volatility

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) is 2.85%, while Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that XUS-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUS-U.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.47%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.19%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

12.19%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

17.09%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

18.26%

+0.93%

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUS-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUS-U.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
0.82%0.91%0.74%0.90%1.04%0.71%0.91%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUS-U.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUS-U.TO and HXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer