PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUKX.L achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


XUKX.L

1D
0.26%
1M
0.81%
YTD
4.28%
6M
6.50%
1Y
17.32%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
4.48%

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUKX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D
4.28%22.37%4.09%3.60%-2.09%5.19%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XUKX.L and LDEG.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.60

The correlation between XUKX.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUKX.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

26.4%
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

13.6%
3.1%

Industrials

13.0%
15.8%

Healthcare

12.9%
3.4%

Energy

10.5%
7.7%

Basic Materials

8.6%
9.9%

Utilities

4.9%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.3%
5.2%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

0.3%
2.0%

Financial Services

XUKX.L
26.4%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

XUKX.L
13.6%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Industrials

XUKX.L
13.0%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Healthcare

XUKX.L
12.9%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Energy

XUKX.L
10.5%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

XUKX.L
8.6%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Utilities

XUKX.L
4.9%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XUKX.L
4.5%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Communication Services

XUKX.L
2.3%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Real Estate

XUKX.L
1.0%
LDEG.L

-

Technology

XUKX.L
0.3%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUKX.L
XUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUKX.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.78

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

13.82

-7.53

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUKX.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUKX.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.63

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.24

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.24

-1.12

Drawdowns

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -46.73%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUKX.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUKX.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.73%

-15.97%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-8.04%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.13%

-12.05%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.42%

-15.97%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-1.33%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-2.95%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.20%

+0.55%

Volatility

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that XUKX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUKX.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.57%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

9.21%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.55%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

15.99%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

16.01%

-0.41%

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUKX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUKX.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

XUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than LDEG.L's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUKX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D
0.03%0.03%0.05%0.04%0.07%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUKX.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUKX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

XUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUKX.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUKX.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer