PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUIN.L achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE.L's 23.45% return.


XUIN.L

1D
1.16%
1M
5.28%
YTD
18.88%
6M
18.23%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*

PAVE.L

1D
1.51%
1M
6.95%
YTD
23.45%
6M
22.32%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
18.88%18.19%17.12%20.92%-6.84%0.48%
PAVE.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
23.45%19.81%17.96%31.55%-6.33%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XUIN.L and PAVE.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.92

The correlation between XUIN.L and PAVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUIN.L
PAVE.L

Industrials

93.7%
75.1%

Technology

5.8%
1.0%

Utilities

5.1%
3.2%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%
20.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

XUIN.L
93.7%
PAVE.L
75.1%

Technology

XUIN.L
5.8%
PAVE.L
1.0%

Utilities

XUIN.L
5.1%
PAVE.L
3.2%

Financial Services

XUIN.L
0.2%
PAVE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XUIN.L
0.2%
PAVE.L

-

Basic Materials

XUIN.L
0.2%
PAVE.L
20.1%

Communication Services

XUIN.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XUIN.L

-

PAVE.L
0.3%

Energy

XUIN.L

-

PAVE.L
0.3%

Healthcare

XUIN.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Real Estate

XUIN.L

-

PAVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUIN.L
XUIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE.L
PAVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUIN.LPAVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.46

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

12.34

-1.68

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUIN.L and PAVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUIN.L drawdown since its inception was -21.71%, smaller than the maximum PAVE.L drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUIN.L and PAVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUIN.LPAVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

-27.10%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-11.77%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.82%

-27.10%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-5.86%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.31%

-0.60%

Volatility

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) is 5.00%, while Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that XUIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUIN.LPAVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

5.43%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

14.77%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

18.58%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

21.69%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

21.69%

-4.26%

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUIN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUIN.L vs. PAVE.L - Dividend Comparison

XUIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while PAVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PAVE.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUIN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D
0.87%1.01%1.12%1.17%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUIN.L and PAVE.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUIN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUIN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.L.

XUIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while PAVE.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUIN.L and 0.47% for PAVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUIN.L and PAVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer