PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUHC.DE achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly higher than DXSE.DE's -1.95% return.


XUHC.DE

1D
2.83%
1M
5.38%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*

DXSE.DE

1D
2.90%
1M
0.52%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUHC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
-1.34%1.47%8.81%-0.83%2.49%36.78%3.35%24.45%9.04%0.80%
DXSE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-1.95%4.97%4.52%9.56%-5.75%25.75%-1.94%32.90%-1.01%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.62

The correlation between XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUHC.DE
XUHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DXSE.DE
DXSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUHC.DEDXSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.06

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.38

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

0.82

+1.87

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUHC.DEDXSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.27

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.32

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.87%, smaller than the maximum DXSE.DE drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUHC.DEDXSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.87%

-34.30%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-12.67%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-28.10%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-28.10%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.48%

-13.88%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-8.34%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

5.81%

-1.24%

Volatility

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) is 5.19%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that XUHC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUHC.DEDXSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.82%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

11.95%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

17.63%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

16.48%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.04%

+0.09%

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUHC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DXSE.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUHC.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while DXSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DXSE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUHC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
1.28%1.29%1.21%1.86%1.63%0.82%1.13%0.96%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DXSE.DE.

XUHC.DE tracks MSCI USA Health Care, while DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUHC.DE and 0.17% for DXSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUHC.DE and DXSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer