XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XUFN.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and SC0U.DE (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XUFN.DE tracks the MSCI USA Financials while SC0U.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Banks. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUFN.DE returned 9.47%/yr vs 27.34%/yr for SC0U.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUFN.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SC0U.DE.

Performance

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUFN.DE achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than SC0U.DE's 5.95% return.

XUFN.DE

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -2.50%
• 1Y: 2.59%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: —

SC0U.DE

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.11%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 38.42%
• 3Y*: 42.79%
• 5Y*: 27.34%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	-4.69%	3.41%	38.69%	10.96%	-7.89%	49.37%	-12.55%	36.23%	-11.22%	14.21%
SC0U.DE Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF	5.95%	79.97%	32.49%	25.93%	-0.07%	37.72%	-22.62%	15.49%	-26.78%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017	0.61

The correlation between XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUFN.DE

XUFN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SC0U.DE

SC0U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 49
SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SC0U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SC0U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SC0U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SC0U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XUFN.DE	SC0U.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.74	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	2.43	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.29	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	2.37	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	7.76	-7.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XUFN.DE	SC0U.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	1.74	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	1.14	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.27	+0.25

Drawdowns

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFN.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.39%, smaller than the maximum SC0U.DE drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUFN.DE	SC0U.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.39%	-60.69%	+17.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.24%	-16.70%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.03%	-19.82%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.03%	-29.85%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.49%	-1.85%	-7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-20.40%	+12.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	5.10%	+0.67%

Volatility

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) is 4.40%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that XUFN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUFN.DE	SC0U.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	6.03%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	18.45%	-7.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	22.74%	-7.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	23.64%	-5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	25.62%	-4.03%

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUFN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0U.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUFN.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUFN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while SC0U.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SC0U.DE Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	1.15%	1.17%	1.08%	1.66%	2.69%	1.25%	1.34%	3.46%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE in my portfolio?

XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XUFN.DE or SC0U.DE?

On fees, XUFN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XUFN.DE or SC0U.DE?

XUFN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0U.DE.

What is the main difference between XUFN.DE and SC0U.DE?

XUFN.DE tracks MSCI USA Financials, while SC0U.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Banks. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFN.DE and 0.20% for SC0U.DE.