PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEB.L achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than JPEA.L's 1.83% return.


XUEB.L

1D
0.35%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.15%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
10Y*

JPEA.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.37%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XUEB.L
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
2.70%13.61%6.10%11.06%5.53%
JPEA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.83%13.77%5.72%10.89%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEB.L and JPEA.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.93

The correlation between XUEB.L and JPEA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEB.L
XUEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XUEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEA.L
JPEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEB.LJPEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.57

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

11.00

+1.94

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEB.L and JPEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEB.LJPEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.29

+0.87

Drawdowns

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEB.L drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, smaller than the maximum JPEA.L drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEB.L and JPEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEB.LJPEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.08%

-28.64%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-4.42%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-7.35%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.06%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-6.80%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.04%

-0.06%

Volatility

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L) have volatilities of 1.98% and 1.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEB.LJPEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

1.91%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

4.55%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

5.63%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

8.88%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

10.21%

-1.61%

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JPEA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEB.L vs. JPEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUEB.L nor JPEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XUEB.L and JPEA.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPEA.L.

XUEB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while JPEA.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEB.L and 0.45% for JPEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEB.L and JPEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer