PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUEB.DE having a 3.66% return and UEFS.DE slightly higher at 3.71%.


XUEB.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.69%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.38%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*

UEFS.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.91%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.67%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
3.66%1.23%11.99%7.34%-14.37%5.65%-0.25%
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
3.71%2.37%13.84%8.28%-14.67%5.66%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2020

0.94

The correlation between XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEB.DE
XUEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

UEFS.DE
UEFS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEB.DEUEFS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.96

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

12.59

-1.76

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEB.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.98

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.44

-0.19

Drawdowns

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum UEFS.DE drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEB.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-24.26%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.87%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-13.70%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

-17.84%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.03%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-7.41%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.91%

+0.05%

Volatility

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEB.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.27%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

3.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

5.76%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.74%

8.69%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

9.37%

-0.81%

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUEB.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEFS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
6.50%7.96%6.14%6.46%6.08%4.22%5.09%4.60%4.53%4.90%2.30%
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEB.DE and UEFS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer