PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEB.DE achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than LYQS.DE's 5.26% return.


XUEB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.87%
6M
5.81%
YTD
5.71%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*

LYQS.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
2.22%
6M
5.27%
YTD
5.26%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
1.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
5.71%1.23%11.99%7.34%-14.37%5.65%-10.39%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.26%0.04%6.43%5.45%-11.25%5.76%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2020

0.78

The correlation between XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEB.DE
XUEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LYQS.DE
LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUEB.DELYQS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

4.26

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

13.30

-11.94

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum LYQS.DE drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEB.DELYQS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-33.51%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-2.80%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-12.78%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

-16.18%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

-0.99%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-12.92%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

0.90%

+9.02%

Volatility

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEB.DELYQS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.48%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

4.08%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

6.04%

+15.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

9.63%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.83%

17.02%

-4.19%

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUEB.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYQS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.09%5.36%3.57%6.06%6.00%4.33%4.48%5.10%5.08%5.40%5.15%6.61%
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEB.DE and LYQS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer