PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUCD.DE achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than 3SUE.DE's 0.62% return.


XUCD.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.35%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

3SUE.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
0.62%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
-3.57%
3Y*
0.49%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUCD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.22%-5.02%38.90%39.32%-34.77%32.20%37.39%4.06%
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.62%-6.04%9.20%-0.30%0.12%22.84%-0.67%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUCD.DE
XUCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

3SUE.DE
3SUE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUCD.DE3SUE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.95

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.41

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

-0.91

+2.91

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the 3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUCD.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

-0.38

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.29

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.31

+0.36

Drawdowns

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than 3SUE.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUCD.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-22.98%

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-10.93%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-13.04%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.43%

-13.04%

-25.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

-10.63%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-5.61%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.97%

+0.12%

Volatility

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE) at 4.88%. This indicates that XUCD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3SUE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUCD.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

4.88%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

9.87%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

12.05%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

11.43%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

13.09%

+8.81%

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUCD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 3SUE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUCD.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than 3SUE.DE's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.62%2.64%2.63%2.44%2.21%2.43%3.30%0.40%0.00%
XUCD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.45%0.46%0.40%0.90%0.91%0.35%0.59%0.81%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUCD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for 3SUE.DE.

XUCD.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom, while 3SUE.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCD.DE and 0.18% for 3SUE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUCD.DE and 3SUE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer