PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XU61.DE achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than IQQ0.DE's 1.59% return.


XU61.DE

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
12.67%
6M
13.88%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IQQ0.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.81%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.63%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.62

The correlation between XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQ0.DE
IQQ0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IQQ0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XU61.DEIQQ0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.00

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

-0.05

+4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.45

-0.12

+17.56

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the IQQ0.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XU61.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

-0.04

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

0.76

+1.04

Drawdowns

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XU61.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.73%, smaller than the maximum IQQ0.DE drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XU61.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-28.65%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-5.22%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-6.65%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-4.54%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.44%

-0.98%

Volatility

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) at 2.53%. This indicates that XU61.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQ0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XU61.DEIQQ0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.53%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

5.36%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

7.78%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.63%

10.08%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.63%

11.62%

-0.99%

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XU61.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQ0.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XU61.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XU61.DE nor IQQ0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQQ0.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQ0.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XU61.DE.

XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index, while IQQ0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas Easy and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for XU61.DE and 0.30% for IQQ0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XU61.DE and IQQ0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer