PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTZS.DE
CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP
-27.36%-64.02%36.49%47.61%-53.62%
ETHC.DE
21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP
-27.44%-21.50%52.05%90.66%-17.54%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XTZS.DE having a -27.36% return and ETHC.DE slightly lower at -27.44%.


XTZS.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
-6.63%
YTD
-27.36%
6M
-46.38%
1Y
-47.35%
3Y*
-30.40%
5Y*
10Y*

ETHC.DE

1D
2.75%
1M
4.78%
YTD
-27.44%
6M
-50.15%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTZS.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTZS.DE
XTZS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XTZS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTZS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTZS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XTZS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTZS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHC.DE
ETHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ETHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTZS.DEETHC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

0.07

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.74

0.59

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.07

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.09

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.18

0.19

-1.36

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTZS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the ETHC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTZS.DE and ETHC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTZS.DEETHC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.07

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.15

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between XTZS.DE and ETHC.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTZS.DE nor ETHC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTZS.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.04%, which is greater than ETHC.DE's maximum drawdown of -64.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTZS.DE and ETHC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTZS.DEETHC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.04%

-64.71%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.55%

-60.75%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.97%

-53.86%

-37.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.52%

-21.89%

-51.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.35%

29.16%

+10.19%

Volatility

XTZS.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) is 12.37%, while 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that XTZS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTZS.DEETHC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.37%

17.81%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.69%

45.62%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.01%

65.55%

+15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.85%

61.23%

+18.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.85%

61.23%

+18.62%