XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE).
XTZS.DE and CSSC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTZS.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Jan 26, 2022. CSSC.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023.
Performance
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XTZS.DE CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP | -27.85% | -64.02% | 36.49% | -1.47% |
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -24.98% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTZS.DE achieves a -27.85% return, which is significantly lower than CSSC.DE's -24.98% return.
XTZS.DE
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -27.85%
- 6M
- -43.35%
- 1Y
- -46.60%
- 3Y*
- -30.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- 1Y
- -22.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTZS.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XTZS.DE
CSSC.DE
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTZS.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | -0.37 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | -0.17 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.98 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.39 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.76 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTZS.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.37 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.17 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between XTZS.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XTZS.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTZS.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.04%, which is greater than CSSC.DE's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTZS.DE and CSSC.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTZS.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.04% | -65.21% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.55% | -61.70% | -2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.04% | -61.76% | -29.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.51% | -26.26% | -47.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.27% | 31.43% | +7.84% |
Volatility
XTZS.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Tezos Staked ETP (XTZS.DE) is 12.35%, while CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that XTZS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSSC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XTZS.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 14.27% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.73% | 41.39% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.02% | 59.72% | +21.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 60.74% | +19.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 60.74% | +19.15% |