PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR.TO achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than PYF.TO's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XTR.TO has outperformed PYF.TO with an annualized return of 5.99%, while PYF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.63% annualized return.


XTR.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
2.50%
YTD
6.55%
6M
6.45%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
5.99%

PYF.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.28%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTR.TO
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF
6.55%8.54%12.80%4.95%-4.48%10.17%2.45%12.86%-3.72%6.61%
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
1.16%5.45%7.42%8.40%5.25%4.95%-1.59%7.28%2.01%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR.TO and PYF.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2016

0.38

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTR.TO
PYF.TO

Financial Services

26.2%
17.0%

Energy

16.1%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
11.9%

Technology

9.1%
23.1%

Utilities

8.0%
0.0%

Industrials

7.1%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
21.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
14.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.0%

Financial Services

XTR.TO
26.2%
PYF.TO
17.0%

Energy

XTR.TO
16.1%
PYF.TO
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

XTR.TO
11.3%
PYF.TO
11.9%

Technology

XTR.TO
9.1%
PYF.TO
23.1%

Utilities

XTR.TO
8.0%
PYF.TO
0.0%

Industrials

XTR.TO
7.1%
PYF.TO
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XTR.TO
6.4%
PYF.TO
21.8%

Healthcare

XTR.TO
5.6%
PYF.TO
14.5%

Basic Materials

XTR.TO
5.6%
PYF.TO
2.2%

Communication Services

XTR.TO
3.8%
PYF.TO
2.6%

Real Estate

XTR.TO
0.9%
PYF.TO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR.TO
XTR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XTR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PYF.TO
PYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTR.TOPYF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.14

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

1.05

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.48

2.83

+14.65

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR.TO and PYF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTR.TOPYF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

0.71

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.16

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.70

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Drawdowns

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.42%, which is greater than PYF.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR.TO and PYF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTR.TOPYF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.42%

-20.53%

-30.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-2.11%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.06%

-5.57%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-5.57%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.92%

-20.53%

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.42%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-0.98%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.79%

-0.04%

Volatility

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) at 1.18%. This indicates that XTR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTR.TOPYF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.18%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

2.29%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

3.20%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

5.19%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

6.67%

+1.66%

Dividends

XTR.TO vs. PYF.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than PYF.TO's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF
7.36%7.84%7.66%7.47%5.78%5.74%5.69%5.29%5.38%5.83%6.59%0.00%
XTR.TO
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF
3.92%4.10%4.27%4.61%4.62%4.21%5.56%5.38%5.75%5.24%5.30%6.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTR.TO and PYF.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTR.TO and PYF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer