PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XTOT.TO having a 12.63% return and XUSC.TO slightly higher at 12.69%.


XTOT.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
7.36%
YTD
12.63%
6M
10.59%
1Y
30.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

0.85

The correlation between XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOT.TO
XTOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XTOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XTOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTOT.TOXUSC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.66

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

13.42

-2.43

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTOT.TOXUSC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.43

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

1.27

+1.04

Drawdowns

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum XUSC.TO drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTOT.TOXUSC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-18.31%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-7.60%

-2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-2.67%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.07%

+0.74%

Volatility

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) at 2.61%. This indicates that XTOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTOT.TOXUSC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

2.61%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

8.51%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

11.46%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

15.72%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

15.72%

-2.58%

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSC.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTOT.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XUSC.TO's 0.84% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTOT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTOT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

XTOT.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index, while XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTOT.TO and 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTOT.TO and XUSC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer