XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO).
XTOT.TO and XUH.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTOT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. It was launched on May 28, 2025. XUH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Feb 17, 2015. Both XTOT.TO and XUH.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XTOT.TO iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF | -2.69% | 15.99% |
XUH.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.14% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTOT.TO achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than XUH.TO's -5.14% return.
XTOT.TO
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUH.TO
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTOT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUH.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XTOT.TO
XUH.TO
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTOT.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.57 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between XTOT.TO and XUH.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Dividend Comparison
XTOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than XUH.TO's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTOT.TO iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUH.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.95% | 0.91% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 1.25% | 1.67% | 1.81% | 1.25% | 1.63% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum XUH.TO drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOT.TO and XUH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTOT.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -38.37% | +28.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -6.73% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -5.02% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XTOT.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 18.44% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 17.08% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 18.67% | -5.49% |