PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOT.TO achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than XUH.TO's -5.14% return.


XTOT.TO

1D
3.22%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUH.TO

1D
2.96%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
-3.06%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUH.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOT.TO

XUH.TO
XUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTOT.TOXUH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.57

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between XTOT.TO and XUH.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than XUH.TO's 0.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XTOT.TO
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF
0.71%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
0.95%0.91%1.10%1.15%1.40%0.98%1.25%1.67%1.81%1.25%1.63%1.62%

Drawdowns

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum XUH.TO drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOT.TO and XUH.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTOT.TOXUH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-38.37%

+28.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.73%

-6.73%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-5.02%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

Volatility

XTOT.TO vs. XUH.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTOT.TOXUH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

18.44%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

17.08%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

18.67%

-5.49%