XTOC vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XTOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XTOC vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XTOC

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 19.19%
• 3Y*: 14.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October	6.34%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

XTOC vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTOC	JULQ
Technology	36.2%	31.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	14.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	10.9%
Industrials	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.2%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XTOC vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC

XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 64
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTOC	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTOC	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTOC	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.09%	0.00%	-24.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	0.00%	-4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XTOC	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	0.00%	+9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	0.00%	+15.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	0.00%	+15.16%

XTOC vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTOC and JULQ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XTOC vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTOC nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XTOC or JULQ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTOC or JULQ?

XTOC and JULQ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTOC or JULQ?

XTOC and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.