PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (XTLT.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTLT.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than XSP.TO's 9.64% return.


XTLT.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.85%
YTD
0.91%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
-1.68%
5Y*
10Y*

XSP.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.98%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.50%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XTLT.TO
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF
0.91%-1.07%-1.47%-2.80%
XSP.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
9.64%15.68%23.39%15.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XTLT.TO and XSP.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2023

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTLT.TO
XTLT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XTLT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTLT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTLT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XTLT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTLT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XSP.TO
XSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (XTLT.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTLT.TOXSP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.68

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

12.40

-11.14

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTLT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the XSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTLT.TO and XSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTLT.TOXSP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.15

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.37

-0.46

Drawdowns

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTLT.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, smaller than the maximum XSP.TO drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTLT.TO and XSP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLT.TOXSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-57.82%

+36.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-9.41%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.07%

-18.77%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-0.73%

-8.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-12.11%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

2.03%

+2.42%

Volatility

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (XTLT.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLT.TOXSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

3.25%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.99%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

11.75%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

16.75%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

18.19%

-4.02%

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTLT.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTLT.TO vs. XSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTLT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than XSP.TO's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSP.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.12%1.23%1.09%1.18%1.37%1.00%1.31%1.73%1.84%1.47%1.75%1.86%
XTLT.TO
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF
4.97%4.60%4.17%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTLT.TO and XSP.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XTLT.TO.

XTLT.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while XSP.TO is S&P 500. XTLT.TO tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while XSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XTLT.TO and 0.09% for XSP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTLT.TO and XSP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer