XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO
XTLH.TO (iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZPL.TO (BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past year, XTLH.TO returned 1.14% vs 3.20% for ZPL.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTLH.TO achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than ZPL.TO's 3.53% return.
XTLH.TO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 1.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPL.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 0.48%
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XTLH.TO iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.62% | 2.61% | -9.55% | -1.06% |
ZPL.TO BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF | 3.53% | -1.77% | 1.41% | -1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTLH.TO and ZPL.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XTLH.TO and ZPL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XTLH.TO
ZPL.TO
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) and BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZPL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTLH.TO | ZPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.07 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 0.65 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 1.37 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.86%, smaller than the maximum ZPL.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTLH.TO and ZPL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTLH.TO | ZPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -33.96% | +18.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -4.91% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.40% | -19.82% | +9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -11.14% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.48% | +1.10% |
Volatility
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZPL.TO) at 2.44%. This indicates that XTLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTLH.TO | ZPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 2.44% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 6.57% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 8.63% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 12.98% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 11.43% | +0.96% |
Dividends
XTLH.TO vs. ZPL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XTLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than ZPL.TO's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTLH.TO iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.58% | 4.42% | 4.32% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPL.TO BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.84% | 3.88% | 4.16% | 4.31% | 3.22% | 2.97% | 3.20% | 3.44% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTLH.TO and ZPL.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.
Find the right allocation for XTLH.TO and ZPL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer