XTJA vs. APRH
XTJA (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and APRH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTJA returned 14.92%/yr vs 7.42%/yr for APRH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
XTJA vs. APRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTJA achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than APRH's 4.49% return.
XTJA
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 19.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRH
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJA vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XTJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January | 7.16% | 13.86% | 15.25% | 12.52% |
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April | 4.49% | 5.84% | 6.91% | 6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTJA and APRH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XTJA and APRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTJA vs. APRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTJA
APRH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XTJA
APRH
Financial Services
XTJA
APRH
Communication Services
XTJA
APRH
Consumer Cyclical
XTJA
APRH
Healthcare
XTJA
APRH
Industrials
XTJA
APRH
Consumer Defensive
XTJA
APRH
Energy
XTJA
APRH
Utilities
XTJA
APRH
Real Estate
XTJA
APRH
Basic Materials
XTJA
APRH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTJA vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank
XTJA
APRH
XTJA vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTJA | APRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 3.18 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 4.75 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.90 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 6.48 | -3.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 22.02 | -7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTJA | APRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 3.18 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.70 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
XTJA vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTJA drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, which is greater than APRH's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJA and APRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTJA | APRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -5.87% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -1.21% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -5.87% | -12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.08% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -0.21% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.36% | +0.99% |
Volatility
XTJA vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) at 0.55%. This indicates that XTJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTJA | APRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.55% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 1.98% | +5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 2.47% | +5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 4.56% | +11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 4.56% | +11.51% |
XTJA vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XTJA and APRH have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
XTJA vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison
XTJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April | 5.35% | 5.49% | 6.87% | 5.90% |
XTJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTJA and APRH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTJA has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to APRH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJA dropped -26.17% vs APRH's -5.87%.
On 3-year performance, XTJA leads with 14.92% vs 7.42% for APRH. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTJA has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 7.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJA and APRH have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
APRH has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 0.00% for XTJA.
APRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTJA and APRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer