XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XTIP.DE (Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and EXUS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XTIP.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while EXUS.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XTIP.DE returned 2.81% vs 20.10% for EXUS.DE. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. XTIP.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.DE.

Performance

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTIP.DE achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.DE's 9.64% return.

XTIP.DE

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: 1.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EXUS.DE

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 20.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XTIP.DE Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C	2.69%	-5.01%	6.98%
EXUS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD	9.64%	17.80%	5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024	-0.00

Return for Risk

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTIP.DE

XTIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XTIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XTIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XTIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XTIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

EXUS.DE

EXUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 49
EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EXUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EXUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EXUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EXUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTIP.DE	EXUS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.62	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.36	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.31	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	2.30	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	9.01	-7.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTIP.DE	EXUS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	1.62	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	1.10	-1.16

Drawdowns

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum EXUS.DE drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTIP.DE	EXUS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.79%	-16.21%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-8.68%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-0.76%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-1.78%	-4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	2.23%	-0.69%

Volatility

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) is 1.05%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XTIP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTIP.DE	EXUS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	3.28%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.07%	10.06%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.00%	12.37%	-6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.60%	13.39%	-5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.60%	13.39%	-5.79%

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTIP.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EXUS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XTIP.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTIP.DE nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE in my portfolio?

XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XTIP.DE or EXUS.DE?

On fees, XTIP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTIP.DE or EXUS.DE?

XTIP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EXUS.DE.

What is the main difference between XTIP.DE and EXUS.DE?

XTIP.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EXUS.DE is Global Equities. XTIP.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTIP.DE and 0.15% for EXUS.DE.