XTAP vs. BEG
XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
XTAP vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.29% | 0.69% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTAP and BEG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTAP vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank
XTAP
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTAP vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTAP | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 62.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTAP vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTAP | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -59.85% | +37.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -13.66% | +12.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -16.74% | +13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
XTAP vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTAP | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83% | 212.91% | -208.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 212.91% | -198.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 212.91% | -198.55% |
XTAP vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTAP vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither XTAP nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XTAP and BEG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for XTAP and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer