PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT01.L vs. IBTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XT01.L is traded in GBP, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT01.L achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBTA.L's 0.82% return.


XT01.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.15%
6M
1.20%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

IBTA.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.06%
6M
0.26%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XT01.L
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
1.86%-2.79%6.91%-0.75%12.89%1.36%-4.63%
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.82%-2.17%5.89%-1.00%7.69%0.30%-4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XT01.L and IBTA.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.78

The correlation between XT01.L and IBTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT01.L
XT01.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XT01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XT01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XT01.LIBTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

1.52

+0.44

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT01.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT01.L and IBTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT01.L drawdown since its inception was -15.30%, smaller than the maximum IBTA.L drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT01.L and IBTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XT01.LIBTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-18.45%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-5.34%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.74%

-9.28%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.30%

-16.66%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-7.84%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-8.98%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.98%

-0.18%

Volatility

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L) is 1.26%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that XT01.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XT01.LIBTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.80%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

5.10%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

6.54%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

8.28%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.30%

8.53%

-0.23%

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT01.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XT01.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XT01.L nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XT01.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XT01.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XT01.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTA.L.

XT01.L tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XT01.L and 0.07% for IBTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT01.L and IBTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer