MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE).
MDBA.DE and 4UBQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDBA.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. 4UBQ.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 ESG. It was launched on Apr 18, 2019. Both MDBA.DE and 4UBQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.36% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -7.87% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | -2.87% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's -2.87% return.
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MDBA.DE
4UBQ.DE
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDBA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | 0.68 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 1.01 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.15 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.35 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 5.33 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 0.68 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.84 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.96 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBA.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MDBA.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -23.35% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.91% | -13.74% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -23.35% | +11.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.99% | -4.95% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -4.12% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.21% | +1.86% |
Volatility
MDBA.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) is 1.84%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that MDBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDBA.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 3.81% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 8.38% | -4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.76% | 17.10% | -10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 15.30% | -8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 15.51% | -8.42% |