XSXG.L vs. I500.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSXG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XSXG.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSXG.L returned 19.21%/yr vs 19.22%/yr for I500.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.

Performance

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSXG.L having a 10.62% return and I500.L slightly lower at 10.61%.

XSXG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 29.28%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

I500.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 29.34%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	10.62%	9.55%	27.53%	20.03%	2.67%
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF	10.61%	9.56%	27.57%	20.04%	2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XSXG.L and I500.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022	0.99

The correlation between XSXG.L and I500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XSXG.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSXG.L

XSXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XSXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XSXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XSXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XSXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

I500.L

I500.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
I500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
I500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
I500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
I500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
I500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSXG.L	I500.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	2.81	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.77	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.52	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	4.13	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.45	15.23	-0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the I500.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSXG.L and I500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSXG.L	I500.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	2.81	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	1.13	+0.13

Drawdowns

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSXG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, roughly equal to the maximum I500.L drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSXG.L and I500.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSXG.L	I500.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.10%	-20.75%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	-7.08%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.10%	-20.75%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.23%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-3.35%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.92%	+0.10%

Volatility

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSXG.L	I500.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.59%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	7.12%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	10.40%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	14.21%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	14.30%	-0.39%

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSXG.L and I500.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSXG.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison

XSXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	0.82%	0.92%	1.11%	1.30%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSXG.L and I500.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, XSXG.L and I500.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XSXG.L or I500.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSXG.L or I500.L?

XSXG.L and I500.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

What is the main difference between XSXG.L and I500.L?

XSXG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.