PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSX6.L having a 6.51% return and SX5S.L slightly lower at 6.46%. Over the past 10 years, XSX6.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 10.18%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


XSX6.L

1D
0.47%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.89%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.18%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
1.56%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.42%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSX6.L
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C
6.51%26.36%3.77%13.18%-4.98%16.80%3.80%20.52%-9.91%15.28%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XSX6.L and SX5S.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.80

The correlation between XSX6.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSX6.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

24.2%
25.1%

Industrials

20.5%
22.1%

Healthcare

12.8%
5.4%

Technology

8.5%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.8%

Energy

5.8%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.7%

Utilities

4.7%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

XSX6.L
24.2%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Industrials

XSX6.L
20.5%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Healthcare

XSX6.L
12.8%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Technology

XSX6.L
8.5%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

XSX6.L
7.5%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XSX6.L
6.9%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Energy

XSX6.L
5.8%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

XSX6.L
5.0%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Utilities

XSX6.L
4.7%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Communication Services

XSX6.L
3.0%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Real Estate

XSX6.L
1.3%
SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSX6.L
XSX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSX6.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.62

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.40

+1.25

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSX6.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSX6.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.23

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.69

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSX6.L drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum SX5S.L drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSX6.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-32.54%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.43%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-13.85%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-21.71%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-32.54%

+4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.57%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.44%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.44%

-0.53%

Volatility

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) is 3.92%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XSX6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSX6.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.90%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

12.23%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

15.09%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

17.62%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

19.88%

-5.04%

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSX6.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSX6.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSX6.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XSX6.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSX6.L.

XSX6.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SX5S.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSX6.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer