PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSX6.L vs. IMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSX6.L achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XSX6.L has outperformed IMV.L with an annualized return of 10.18%, while IMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.


XSX6.L

1D
0.47%
1M
3.23%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.84%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.18%

IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSX6.L
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C
6.51%26.36%3.77%13.18%-4.98%16.80%3.80%20.52%-9.91%15.28%
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XSX6.L and IMV.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013

0.88

The correlation between XSX6.L and IMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSX6.L
IMV.L

Financial Services

24.2%
17.9%

Industrials

20.5%
15.4%

Healthcare

12.8%
13.0%

Technology

8.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
3.6%

Energy

5.8%
7.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.6%

Utilities

4.7%
10.2%

Communication Services

3.0%
9.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.6%

Financial Services

XSX6.L
24.2%
IMV.L
17.9%

Industrials

XSX6.L
20.5%
IMV.L
15.4%

Healthcare

XSX6.L
12.8%
IMV.L
13.0%

Technology

XSX6.L
8.5%
IMV.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSX6.L
7.5%
IMV.L
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSX6.L
6.9%
IMV.L
3.6%

Energy

XSX6.L
5.8%
IMV.L
7.1%

Basic Materials

XSX6.L
5.0%
IMV.L
5.6%

Utilities

XSX6.L
4.7%
IMV.L
10.2%

Communication Services

XSX6.L
3.0%
IMV.L
9.6%

Real Estate

XSX6.L
1.3%
IMV.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSX6.L
XSX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSX6.LIMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.97

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

2.92

+3.73

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the IMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSX6.L and IMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSX6.LIMV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

0.91

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.69

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.62

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.71

-0.05

Drawdowns

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSX6.L drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than IMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.L and IMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSX6.LIMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-24.48%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-8.50%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-8.50%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-17.42%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-24.48%

-3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-4.62%

+3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-3.57%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.83%

+0.08%

Volatility

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that XSX6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSX6.LIMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

2.89%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

7.71%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

9.13%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

10.97%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

12.31%

+2.53%

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSX6.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSX6.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSX6.L nor IMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSX6.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSX6.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSX6.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSX6.L and IMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer