PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSX6.L (Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C) and IEDL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - XSX6.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while IEDL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSX6.L returned 9.84%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for IEDL.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSX6.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEDL.L.

Performance

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSX6.L is traded in GBp, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSX6.L achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 13.19% return.

XSX6.L

1D
0.47%
1M
3.23%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.84%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.18%

IEDL.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.86%
YTD
13.19%
6M
15.86%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSX6.L
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C		6.51%26.36%3.77%13.18%-4.98%16.80%3.80%20.52%-7.52%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		13.19%42.22%5.44%11.24%1.22%19.20%-3.60%14.87%-10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XSX6.L and IEDL.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.89

The correlation between XSX6.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSX6.L
IEDL.L

Financial Services

24.2%
22.6%

Industrials

20.5%
17.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
12.3%

Technology

8.5%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.2%

Energy

5.8%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
6.2%

Utilities

4.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.6%

Financial Services

XSX6.L
24.2%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Industrials

XSX6.L
20.5%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Healthcare

XSX6.L
12.8%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Technology

XSX6.L
8.5%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

XSX6.L
7.5%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XSX6.L
6.9%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Energy

XSX6.L
5.8%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Basic Materials

XSX6.L
5.0%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Utilities

XSX6.L
4.7%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Communication Services

XSX6.L
3.0%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Real Estate

XSX6.L
1.3%
IEDL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Often compared with XSX6.L:
XSX6.L vs. MEUD.LXSX6.L vs. CS51.LXSX6.L vs. VOOXSX6.L vs. SUSW.LXSX6.L vs. VUAA.DEXSX6.L vs. VEAXSX6.L vs. VWRA.L
Often compared with IEDL.L:
IEDL.L vs. S7XP.LIEDL.L vs. XHYG.DEIEDL.L vs. MVEW.DEIEDL.L vs. T3KE.DEIEDL.L vs. EUMD.LIEDL.L vs. CNX1.LIEDL.L vs. VEUR.L

Return for Risk

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSX6.L
XSX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSX6.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
2.68

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.27
3.61

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.43

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

12.68

-6.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSX6.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSX6.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.68

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.95

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSX6.L drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum IEDL.L drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.L and IEDL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSX6.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-34.37%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-10.54%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-16.23%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-16.28%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.80%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.72%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.86%

+0.05%

Volatility

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) is 3.92%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that XSX6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSX6.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.75%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

11.06%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

13.48%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

15.30%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

17.59%

-2.75%

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSX6.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSX6.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

XSX6.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%
XSX6.L
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, XSX6.L and IEDL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSX6.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSX6.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

XSX6.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSX6.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer