XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L
XSX6.L (Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XSX6.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSX6.L returned 10.18%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSPX.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSX6.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSX6.L is traded in GBp, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSX6.L achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XSX6.L has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 10.18%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
XSX6.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSX6.L Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C | 6.51% | 26.36% | 3.77% | 13.18% | -4.98% | 16.80% | 3.80% | 20.52% | -9.91% | 15.28% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.77% | 9.09% | 27.44% | 20.40% | -9.06% | 30.58% | 14.17% | 25.59% | 0.15% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSX6.L and CSPX.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XSX6.L and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Industrials
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Healthcare
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Technology
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Energy
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Basic Materials
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Utilities
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Communication Services
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Real Estate
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSX6.L
CSPX.L
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSX6.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.95 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 13.49 | -6.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSX6.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.38 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.98 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.98 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSX6.L drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.L and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSX6.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -25.99% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -7.22% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.63% | -21.16% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.17% | -21.16% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.43% | -25.99% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.28% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -3.29% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.13% | +0.78% |
Volatility
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that XSX6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSX6.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.49% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 8.67% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 11.99% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 15.39% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 16.37% | -1.53% |
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSX6.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSX6.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSX6.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSX6.L and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSX6.L.
XSX6.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. XSX6.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for XSX6.L and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer