PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSX6.L having a 6.51% return and CEUR.L slightly higher at 6.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSX6.L having a 10.18% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.


XSX6.L

1D
0.47%
1M
3.23%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.84%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.18%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSX6.L
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C
6.51%26.36%3.77%13.18%-4.98%16.80%3.80%20.52%-9.91%15.28%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XSX6.L and CEUR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.90

The correlation between XSX6.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSX6.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

24.2%
25.1%

Industrials

20.5%
19.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
13.8%

Technology

8.5%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.2%

Energy

5.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.8%

Utilities

4.7%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.7%

Financial Services

XSX6.L
24.2%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

XSX6.L
20.5%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

XSX6.L
12.8%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Technology

XSX6.L
8.5%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

XSX6.L
7.5%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSX6.L
6.9%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Energy

XSX6.L
5.8%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

XSX6.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Utilities

XSX6.L
4.7%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Communication Services

XSX6.L
3.0%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

XSX6.L
1.3%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSX6.L
XSX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSX6.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.74

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

6.06

+0.59

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSX6.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSX6.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSX6.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.54

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.68

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.66

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.56

+0.11

Drawdowns

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSX6.L drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, roughly equal to the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSX6.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-28.63%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.05%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-12.66%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-17.85%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-28.63%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.52%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.58%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.17%

-0.26%

Volatility

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) is 3.92%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that XSX6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSX6.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.25%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

10.53%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

12.44%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

13.88%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.97%

-0.13%

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSX6.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSX6.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSX6.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XSX6.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSX6.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSX6.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer