PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSU.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSU.TO achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XSU.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 8.99%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.


XSU.TO

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.54%
YTD
15.84%
6M
14.30%
1Y
35.82%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
8.99%

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSU.TO
iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
15.84%10.50%9.67%14.70%-21.66%12.77%15.71%23.81%-12.82%13.66%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%25.14%2.94%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XSU.TO and VFV.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012

0.66

The correlation between XSU.TO and VFV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSU.TO
VFV.TO

Industrials

17.5%
8.3%

Technology

16.9%
35.7%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.5%

Financial Services

15.9%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.2%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.9%

Energy

6.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Industrials

XSU.TO
17.5%
VFV.TO
8.3%

Technology

XSU.TO
16.9%
VFV.TO
35.7%

Healthcare

XSU.TO
16.5%
VFV.TO
8.5%

Financial Services

XSU.TO
15.9%
VFV.TO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XSU.TO
8.4%
VFV.TO
10.2%

Real Estate

XSU.TO
6.2%
VFV.TO
1.9%

Energy

XSU.TO
6.2%
VFV.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

XSU.TO
4.8%
VFV.TO
1.8%

Utilities

XSU.TO
2.9%
VFV.TO
2.4%

Communication Services

XSU.TO
2.5%
VFV.TO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSU.TO
2.4%
VFV.TO
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSU.TO
XSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSU.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSU.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.44

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

13.10

-2.05

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSU.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSU.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.59

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

1.14

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.97

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.14

-0.88

Drawdowns

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.62%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSU.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSU.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.62%

-27.43%

-35.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-8.62%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.16%

-19.05%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

-22.19%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

-27.43%

-17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-0.18%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-3.35%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.26%

+0.99%

Volatility

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that XSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSU.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

3.05%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

8.55%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

11.46%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.74%

14.91%

+7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.49%

16.57%

+6.92%

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSU.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
XSU.TO
iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
0.73%0.85%0.93%1.09%1.28%0.73%0.79%1.00%1.12%0.95%1.16%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSU.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSU.TO.

XSU.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. XSU.TO tracks Morningstar US SMID TR CAD, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSU.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSU.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer