XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSTP.TO (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF) and QTIP.NEO (Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - XSTP.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl Core Bd GR CAD while QTIP.NEO tracks the Solactive US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Hedged to CAD TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSTP.TO returned 6.18%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for QTIP.NEO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSTP.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QTIP.NEO.

Performance

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF (XSTP.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSTP.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than QTIP.NEO's 0.87% return.

XSTP.TO

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 6.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTIP.NEO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: 2.85%
• 3Y*: 2.70%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XSTP.TO iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF	3.35%	0.64%	13.59%	2.31%	17.76%	4.89%
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	0.87%	4.82%	0.82%	3.50%	-12.98%	3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021	0.07

The correlation between XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSTP.TO

XSTP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 28
XSTP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XSTP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XSTP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
XSTP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XSTP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QTIP.NEO

QTIP.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 25
QTIP.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
QTIP.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QTIP.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QTIP.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
QTIP.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF (XSTP.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSTP.TO	QTIP.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.81	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.16	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.14	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.42	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.84	3.58	-0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSTP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the QTIP.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSTP.TO	QTIP.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.81	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.35	+0.63

Drawdowns

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSTP.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum QTIP.NEO drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSTP.TO	QTIP.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-15.03%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.76%	-2.02%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	-4.59%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-4.09%	+3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-4.78%	+3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	0.80%	+1.16%

Volatility

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF (XSTP.TO) is 0.94%, while Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that XSTP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTIP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSTP.TO	QTIP.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	1.27%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.50%	2.48%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.91%	3.56%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.13%	6.25%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.13%	6.31%	+2.82%

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSTP.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than QTIP.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSTP.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XSTP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, which matches QTIP.NEO's 3.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	3.56%	4.54%	4.53%	5.08%	9.47%	5.24%	2.17%	2.29%	2.91%
XSTP.TO iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond Index ETF	3.57%	4.06%	2.41%	3.08%	5.70%	2.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO in my portfolio?

XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSTP.TO or QTIP.NEO?

On fees, QTIP.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSTP.TO or QTIP.NEO?

QTIP.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XSTP.TO.

What is the main difference between XSTP.TO and QTIP.NEO?

XSTP.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Core Bd GR CAD, while QTIP.NEO tracks Solactive US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Hedged to CAD TR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XSTP.TO and 0.15% for QTIP.NEO.