PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSTC.L is traded in GBp, while XUT3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUT3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 23.32% return, which is significantly higher than XUT3.L's 0.95% return.


XSTC.L

1D
-2.13%
1M
12.50%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.32%
1Y
52.27%
3Y*
30.65%
5Y*
24.21%
10Y*

XUT3.L

1D
0.10%
1M
1.04%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.23%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
1.56%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.32%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%33.47%41.54%43.20%3.21%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.92%-2.42%5.95%-1.10%7.87%0.32%-0.08%-0.38%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XSTC.L and XUT3.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSTC.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.12

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

0.85

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

2.31

+5.48

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSTC.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSTC.LXUT3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

0.69

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.36

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.33

+0.80

Drawdowns

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSTC.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.30%

-18.58%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-5.21%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-9.27%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

-16.72%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-8.02%

+5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-8.22%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

1.92%

+4.91%

Volatility

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) at 1.65%. This indicates that XSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSTC.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

1.65%

+5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

4.93%

+9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

6.41%

+13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

8.22%

+14.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

9.43%

+13.00%

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XUT3.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSTC.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than XUT3.L's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%0.00%0.00%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSTC.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUT3.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUT3.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSTC.L.

XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XUT3.L is Government Bonds. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.06% for XUT3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer