XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L
XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - XSTC.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSTC.L returned 24.21%/yr vs 26.61%/yr for XLKS.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XSTC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSTC.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSTC.L having a 23.32% return and XLKS.L slightly higher at 24.03%.
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 26.61%
- 10Y*
- 27.23%
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 24.03% | 15.38% | 44.20% | 52.61% | -20.70% | 36.00% | 38.58% | 43.17% | 2.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSTC.L and XLKS.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XSTC.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
Industrials
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
Communication Services
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
-
Energy
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
-
Financial Services
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
Basic Materials
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Healthcare
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Real Estate
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Utilities
XSTC.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSTC.L
XLKS.L
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSTC.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.20 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 8.18 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSTC.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 1.10 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSTC.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -28.80% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -16.92% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -28.80% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -28.80% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.80% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -4.71% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 6.63% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) is 7.05%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that XSTC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSTC.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 7.55% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 15.35% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 20.23% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 23.02% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 22.09% | +0.34% |
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSTC.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XSTC.L and XLKS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKS.L.
XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer