XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L
XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) and XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDPG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 GBP Hedged. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSTC.L returned 24.75%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for XDPG.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSTC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDPG.L.
Performance
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than XDPG.L's 9.88% return.
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- 25.07%
- 1Y
- 57.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.88%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- —
XDPG.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 26.01% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 9.88% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | -20.73% | 28.87% | 15.23% | 27.55% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSTC.L and XDPG.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XSTC.L and XDPG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Industrials
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Communication Services
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Energy
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Financial Services
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
Basic Materials
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Consumer Defensive
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Healthcare
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Real Estate
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Utilities
XSTC.L
-
XDPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSTC.L
XDPG.L
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSTC.L | XDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.29 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 14.14 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSTC.L | XDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.35 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.78 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.74 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum XDPG.L drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and XDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSTC.L | XDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -35.91% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -8.31% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -19.07% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -25.62% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.56% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -4.80% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 1.94% | +4.88% |
Volatility
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) at 3.19%. This indicates that XSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSTC.L | XDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 3.19% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 8.59% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 11.66% | +7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 16.00% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 16.61% | +5.81% |
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSTC.L vs. XDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while XDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSTC.L and XDPG.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSTC.L.
XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDPG.L is S&P 500. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.09% for XDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and XDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer