PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XST.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XST.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. XST.TO is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XST.TO returned 12.73%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XST.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.

Performance

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 13.22% return.

XST.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.77%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
9.62%

XEQT.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
6.02%
YTD
13.22%
6M
11.68%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		1.77%16.38%19.83%6.37%8.76%20.39%3.48%-3.02%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		13.22%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XST.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.35

The correlation between XST.TO and XEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XST.TO
XEQT.TO

Consumer Defensive

74.9%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

25.1%
7.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.3%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Energy

-

7.2%

Financial Services

-

20.3%

Healthcare

-

6.6%

Industrials

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Technology

-

22.9%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XST.TO
74.9%
XEQT.TO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XST.TO
25.1%
XEQT.TO
7.8%

Basic Materials

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
7.3%

Communication Services

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
6.4%

Energy

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
7.2%

Financial Services

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
20.3%

Healthcare

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
6.6%

Industrials

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
12.1%

Real Estate

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
2.2%

Technology

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
22.9%

Utilities

XST.TO

-

XEQT.TO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XST.TO:
XST.TO vs. VDCXST.TO vs. VOOXST.TO vs. BALTXST.TO vs. XQQ.TOXST.TO vs. XSTP.TOXST.TO vs. XCD.TOXST.TO vs. CHSCP
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XST.TO
XST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XST.TOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.46
2.62

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.75
3.61

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.48

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

3.70

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

16.13

-14.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XST.TO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XST.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

2.62

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.07

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.96

+0.03

Drawdowns

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XST.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-29.74%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-8.25%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-15.08%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.86%

-19.56%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

0.00%

-6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-4.11%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

1.89%

+2.55%

Volatility

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that XST.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XST.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.70%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

9.41%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

11.65%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

13.13%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

15.56%

-0.61%

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than XEQT.TO's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.47%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		0.68%0.67%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.68%0.74%0.73%0.81%0.90%0.52%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XST.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XST.TO.

XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XST.TO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer