PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XST.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XST.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO returned 19.03%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for HXQ.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XST.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.

Performance

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's 19.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO has underperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 19.03%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.27% annualized return.

XST.TO

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.14%
YTD
4.80%
6M
5.68%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
47.03%
5Y*
30.79%
10Y*
19.03%

HXQ.TO

1D
0.78%
1M
3.00%
YTD
19.67%
6M
19.59%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
22.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		4.80%16.38%140.92%7.25%9.63%21.31%4.28%12.92%2.53%7.95%
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF		19.67%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XST.TO and HXQ.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.24

The correlation between XST.TO and HXQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XST.TO
HXQ.TO

Consumer Defensive

74.9%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

25.1%
13.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

4.4%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Technology

-

55.9%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

XST.TO
74.9%
HXQ.TO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XST.TO
25.1%
HXQ.TO
13.2%

Basic Materials

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
1.0%

Communication Services

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
15.8%

Energy

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.5%

Financial Services

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.3%

Healthcare

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
4.4%

Industrials

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
3.1%

Real Estate

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.2%

Technology

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
55.9%

Utilities

XST.TO

-

HXQ.TO
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF

Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF

Often compared with XST.TO:
XST.TO vs. VDCXST.TO vs. VOOXST.TO vs. BALTXST.TO vs. XQQ.TOXST.TO vs. XSTP.TOXST.TO vs. XCD.TOXST.TO vs. CHSCP
Often compared with HXQ.TO:
HXQ.TO vs. QQC.TOHXQ.TO vs. XQQ.TOHXQ.TO vs. VFV.TOHXQ.TO vs. QQQHXQ.TO vs. HXS.TOHXQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOHXQ.TO vs. QQC-F.TO

Return for Risk

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XST.TO
XST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XST.TOHXQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.65
2.37

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.02
3.07

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.19

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

10.12

-7.75

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XST.TO and HXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum HXQ.TO drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and HXQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XST.TOHXQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-31.60%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-12.43%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-22.58%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.86%

-31.60%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-31.60%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-2.58%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-5.74%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

3.91%

+0.57%

Volatility

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) is 4.89%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that XST.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XST.TOHXQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

7.27%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

13.32%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

16.70%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.19%

20.92%

+26.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.42%

20.92%

+14.50%

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XST.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		0.66%0.68%0.87%1.57%1.48%1.37%1.48%1.46%1.62%1.80%1.03%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

XST.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XST.TO.

XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XST.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XST.TO and HXQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer