XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO
XST.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF) and CGL-C.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XST.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while CGL-C.TO is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price (CAD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO returned 18.64%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for CGL-C.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XST.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CGL-C.TO.
Performance
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly higher than CGL-C.TO's -3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO has outperformed CGL-C.TO with an annualized return of 18.64%, while CGL-C.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.
XST.TO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- 46.09%
- 5Y*
- 30.02%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.68%
CGL-C.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- -16.38%
- YTD
- -3.54%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 29.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | CA$708.29K | CA$726.97K | CA$936.83K |
| CA$965.61K | CA$1.09M | CA$1.21M |
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XST.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.83% | 16.38% | 140.92% | 7.25% | 9.63% | 21.31% | 4.28% | 12.92% | 2.53% | 7.95% |
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | -3.54% | 55.55% | 37.41% | 10.13% | 6.11% | -4.85% | 21.75% | 11.98% | 6.86% | 4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XST.TO and CGL-C.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XST.TO
CGL-C.TO
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XST.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.27 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum CGL-C.TO drawdown of -30.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and CGL-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XST.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -30.01% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -23.55% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.86% | -23.55% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.86% | -23.55% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -23.55% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -21.77% | +18.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -10.79% | +7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 10.40% | -5.83% |
Volatility
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) is 4.45%, while iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that XST.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGL-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XST.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 6.62% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 22.80% | -9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 26.96% | -9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.25% | 17.47% | +29.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.46% | 15.64% | +19.82% |
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CGL-C.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XST.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while CGL-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XST.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.57% | 1.48% | 1.37% | 1.48% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.80% | 1.03% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XST.TO and CGL-C.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGL-C.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGL-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XST.TO.
XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CGL-C.TO is Gold. XST.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while CGL-C.TO tracks LBMA Gold Price (CAD). Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.55% for CGL-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for XST.TO and CGL-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer