XSPI vs. LQTI
XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XSPI is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
XSPI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XSPI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSPI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.22% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPI and LQTI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
XSPI
LQTI
XSPI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.88 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
XSPI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.59%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -3.41% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -1.44% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -0.88% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
XSPI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 5.10% | +12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 5.97% | +11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 5.97% | +11.67% |
XSPI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSPI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 6.83% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPI and LQTI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.
LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.11%, compared with 6.83% for XSPI.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for XSPI and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer