XSPI vs. LQTI
Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).
XSPI and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSPI is a passively managed fund by NEOS Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Feb 2, 2026. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.
Performance
XSPI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSPI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | -6.01% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.59% |
Returns By Period
XSPI
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSPI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSPI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
XSPI
LQTI
XSPI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.48 | 0.90 | -2.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPI and LQTI is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XSPI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 3.05% | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
Drawdowns
XSPI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.59%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and LQTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -3.41% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | -2.03% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -0.78% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
XSPI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSPI | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.09% | 6.23% | +15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 6.11% | +15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 6.11% | +15.98% |