XSPI vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSPI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the S&P 500, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. XSPI is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

XSPI vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XSPI

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 17.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPI vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	3.60%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPI and FFUT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	-0.14

Return for Risk

XSPI vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPI vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSPI	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.26	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.04	—

Drawdowns

XSPI vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSPI	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-5.34%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.02%	-5.34%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-0.97%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XSPI	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	11.27%	+7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.67%	11.05%	+7.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.67%	11.05%	+7.62%

XSPI vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSPI vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than FFUT's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.94%	2.09%
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	7.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSPI and FFUT in my portfolio?

XSPI and FFUT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSPI or FFUT?

On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSPI or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSPI or FFUT?

XSPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.06%, compared with 1.94% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between XSPI and FFUT?

XSPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.80% for FFUT.