XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L).
XSNR.L and WMAT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSNR.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Jul 3, 2007. WMAT.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both XSNR.L and WMAT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -0.29% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 21.19% | 12.17% | 27.37% | -12.09% | 21.42% |
WMAT.L SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF | 12.69% | 17.36% | -4.08% | 8.68% | 0.67% | 16.73% | 17.13% | 17.85% | -12.39% | 17.89% |
Different Trading Currencies
XSNR.L is traded in GBp, while WMAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WMAT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than WMAT.L's 12.69% return.
XSNR.L
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -7.50%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
WMAT.L
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WMAT.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSNR.L
WMAT.L
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSNR.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.67 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.23 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.14 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 9.79 | -5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSNR.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.67 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.67 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSNR.L and WMAT.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSNR.L nor WMAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than WMAT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and WMAT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSNR.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -38.35% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -15.51% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -28.08% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -7.40% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -7.24% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility
XSNR.L vs. WMAT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) is 8.45%, while SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that XSNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSNR.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 9.37% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 14.52% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 18.12% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 16.89% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 17.98% | +0.70% |