PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMC.TO achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.


XSMC.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.67%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
16.67%0.80%17.06%13.24%-10.56%25.12%8.66%3.84%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMC.TO and VFV.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.61

The correlation between XSMC.TO and VFV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMC.TO
VFV.TO

Financial Services

16.4%
11.6%

Industrials

16.1%
8.3%

Technology

16.0%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.2%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.4%
1.9%

Energy

7.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
11.3%

Utilities

1.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

XSMC.TO
16.4%
VFV.TO
11.6%

Industrials

XSMC.TO
16.1%
VFV.TO
8.3%

Technology

XSMC.TO
16.0%
VFV.TO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMC.TO
12.9%
VFV.TO
10.2%

Healthcare

XSMC.TO
10.8%
VFV.TO
8.5%

Real Estate

XSMC.TO
7.4%
VFV.TO
1.9%

Energy

XSMC.TO
7.0%
VFV.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

XSMC.TO
4.6%
VFV.TO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSMC.TO
3.4%
VFV.TO
4.9%

Communication Services

XSMC.TO
3.2%
VFV.TO
11.3%

Utilities

XSMC.TO
1.8%
VFV.TO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMC.TO
XSMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMC.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.59

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

3.53

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

3.44

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

13.10

+0.46

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMC.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMC.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.59

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.14

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.14

-0.68

Drawdowns

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMC.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMC.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-27.43%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.62%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-19.05%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-22.19%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.18%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-3.35%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.26%

+0.15%

Volatility

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that XSMC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMC.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.05%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

8.55%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

11.46%

+6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

14.91%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

16.57%

+6.73%

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSMC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
0.99%1.16%1.74%1.00%1.09%1.19%0.78%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMC.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XSMC.TO.

XSMC.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. XSMC.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSMC.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMC.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer